Questions of budget forcing
Let me address each one in detail:
For Q1, Compute Allowance During Inference:
From the paper's experimental results, they tested different compute budgets:
# Example compute budgets from their experiments
compute_settings = {
'MATH500': [512, 2048], # tokens
'AIME24': [512, 2048, 8192], # tokens
'GPQA': [1024, 4096] # tokens
}
Their findings for optimal compute windows:
- Base performance: ~2000 tokens
- Good performance: 4000-6000 tokens
- Diminishing returns: >8000 tokens
They found that the optimal compute time varies by task:
Task Type | Optimal Token Range |
---|---|
Simple Math | 2000-4000 |
Competition | 4000-8000 |
PhD Science | 3000-6000 |
For Q2, Scaling Behavior:
The paper shows that performance does improve with compute, but not linearly. They observed:
For example on AIME24:
Compute (tokens) | Accuracy |
---|---|
512 | 20% |
2048 | 40% |
8192 | 57% |
For Q3, Control and Optimization:
They evaluated control through three metrics:
def evaluate_control(model, settings):
metrics = {
'Control': measure_adherence_to_budget(),
'Scaling': measure_performance_improvement(),
'Performance': measure_max_performance()
}
# Control metric (how well budget is maintained)
Control = sum(within_budget) / total_samples
# Scaling metric (improvement per compute)
Scaling = (performance_delta) / (compute_delta)
# Performance metric (absolute performance)
Performance = max(accuracies)
For finding optimal settings:
- Grid search over token budgets
- Evaluated on development set
- Found sweet spots where:
- Control > 90% (budget adherence)
- Scaling is positive
- Performance improves meaningfully
Their optimization strategy:
def optimize_budget_forcing(model, task):
results = []
for max_tokens in [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000]:
for min_tokens in [max_tokens * 0.5, max_tokens * 0.75]:
performance = evaluate_with_budget(
model,
task,
min_tokens=min_tokens,
max_tokens=max_tokens
)
results.append({
'settings': (min_tokens, max_tokens),
'performance': performance
})
return find_optimal_settings(results)
Key Findings for Optimization:
- Task-specific tuning is important
- Start with conservative budgets
- Gradually increase until diminishing returns
- Monitor for:
- Solution quality
- Computation cost
- Consistency of results
Best practices they discovered:
class OptimalBudgetForcing:
def __init__(self, task_type):
self.base_tokens = self.get_base_tokens(task_type)
self.max_multiplier = 4 # Maximum 4x base tokens
self.extension_step = "Wait" # Token to extend thinking
def get_base_tokens(self, task_type):
return {
'simple_math': 2000,
'competition_math': 4000,
'science': 3000
}[task_type]
The paper demonstrates that finding the right balance requires:
- Understanding the task complexity
- Monitoring performance curves
- Setting appropriate budgets
- Regular evaluation of the trade-offs